Cyclists are NOT barred from Oxford Circus

Regular visitors to i b i k e l o n d o n will recall my post questioning whether cyclists had been barred from the new Oxford Circus development, and showing how unclear and un-cycle friendly the signage was.

Well, I'm not sure if the new signange is any less unclear, but it does show at least that cyclists have the full right to make turns across Oxford Circus where all other vehicles are allowed to turn.

New signs - taxis, buses AND bicycles (Picture: Westminster Cycle Campaign)

A small victory, perhaps, but the points I made originally are still valid;

A.  It's nice to know that one can cycle about town without breaking the law or worrying that you may have done so.

B.  In this, Boris Johnson's so-called cycling city, things should have been clearer from the outset considering this was supposed to be a £5 million flag-ship street development.

A big thanks to our friends at the Westminster Cycling Campaign for the tip-off about the changed signs.

Are cyclists banned from Oxford Circus?

London's busiest pedestrian crossing used to be a perennial muddle of heaving buses, squeezing, wheezing pedestrians and a cattle-pen of people trying to work their way across lanes of traffic from department stores to Underground station and back again. Oxford Circus was not, in any way, a pleasurable experience for anyone.





The crossing was recently redeveloped to prioritise pedestrians and allow them to cross diagonally as well as laterally. Pedestrian space has been increased, barriers and street clutter have been removed, traffic has been slowed and the Circus has become a 'naked street' where all players take responsibility for their own actions, and (so the theory goes) therefore act more safely.  The entire consultation, design and construction process took two years and cost some 5 million pounds.  The press in the UK has portrayed it as a revolution in urban planning.





So far, so good. So it was to my surprise that the Westminster arm of the London Cycle Campaign recently pointed out that it was their opinion that cyclists had been barred from Oxford Street. Surely this couldn't be possible, not in Mayor Boris Johnson's cycling city on this, what must be the eve of his so-called cycling revolution?!
Armed with my trusty camera I braved the Christmas shopping hordes to find out for myself.





There sure enough was the 'X Crossing' or 'Circus Scramble', if you prefer, in action. Vehicles went one way, then went the other way, then all the little green men came on at once and pedestrians went all ways and any ways. There were cyclists to be seen traversing the Circus too. Some with very exciting hair cuts.





But just as Westminster LCC had forewarned me, there were the signs attached to the traffic lights that told me all I need to know: 'Straight ahead only, except buses and taxis', or 'No turn, except buses and taxis'.






Back home I thought I'd check on the free cycling maps that the nice people at Transport for London provide just to make sure that Oxford Circus hadn't always banned cyclists (for example like at Trafalgar Square) But no, there on the map the Circus was painted blue, which supposedly means it's a "Route signed for cyclists that may be on busier roads"


According to the signs attached to the traffic lights:


Cyclists approaching Oxford Circus from Regent Street (north or south) have to continue straight ahead and cannot turn into Oxford Street.


Cyclists approaching Oxford Circus from Oxford Street (east or west) have to turn left into Regent Street and cannot continue along Oxford Street.


Cyclists in Harewood Place have to continue straight ahead into Holles Street and cannot turn into Oxford Street.





Either this is some kind of deliberate plan to exclude cyclists from Oxford Circus - in which case Westminster Council are up to something - or it is massive "fail" on the part of the planners and designers to incorporate cycles into their descriptions, directions, sign posting and street design.


Of course, just like a red traffic light there is no actual physical barrier to stop you from turning if your heart is set on it and you judge it safe to do so, but I'd prefer to be able to cycle throughout the city without having to take the law into my own hands because of some half-baked ill-thought-out planning decision. Regardless of the rights of wrongs on all sides cyclists will continue to turn across the Circus should they so please, but this is hardly a 'best practice' example of how to make cycling an easy and attractive transport option for ordinary and everyday people. And, yes, at the most base of levels, as a tax payer who contributes to the building and maintenance of roads (yes, that's right, I'm a cyclist and I pay 'road tax' ) I want to make sure that my transport option of choice - the bicycle - is catered for when 5 million big ones are being spent on 'improving' our urban environment.


Members of the LCC are currently waiting to hear back from Westminster Council on what on earth is going on, but the Council, it seems, has been busy with other cycling schemes.