Showing posts with label Copenhagen. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Copenhagen. Show all posts

In defence of fair-weather cyclists: how do you keep a city cycling, even in the worst of winter?


One of the most persistent criticisms I hear levelled against investing in cycling is that as soon as the weather becomes inclement people stop riding, therefore making it an unreliable way of moving people in cities.

Cyclists in a recent rush hour snow storm in Copenhagen, via the Copenhagenize / Viking Biking Tumbr.

Whilst the difference between summer and winter cycling levels in London have been decreasing year on year, the number of cyclists on the road over the winter months is markedly lower than in the long, light and warmer summer days.

If a journey by bicycle is tolerated for the sake of convenience, rather than comfort, it is true that poor weather can serve to increase the perception of it being sketchy.  I personally dread cycling around Old Street roundabout or through Holborn Circus in heavy rain with reduced visability.  No matter how good your waterproofs, you'll still be soaked through with the sweat of anxiety by the end of your terrifying trip.

Cyclists in the snow, Bethnal Green, London, 2010

Of course, it is not the actual rain, snow or darkness that I fear but the chance that my fellow road users are not paying sufficient attention to the conditions, and do not modify their behaviour appropriately.

In successful cycling countries this problem is solved by separating cyclists from motorised traffic one way or another; perhaps with cycle tracks on main roads, or with closures, restrictions and one-way routes on lesser roads with lighter traffic.  But this in turn can pose its own problems: in the worst of the winter weather, how do you keep cyclists - and the city - moving?



When you have a high percentage of your population making their journey by bikes - as in Copenhagen or across the Netherlands - making sure that cycle routes are clear becomes a very serious consideration.  In another fascinating new post, video blogger Mark of Bicycle Dutch fame recently recorded how his home city of 'S-Hertogenbosch kept people moving through a recent snow storm, and made journeys by bicycle possible in challenging conditions.  

He explains: "On a cycle way the ‘gritters’ brush the surface first, and then it is sprayed with a mixture of salt and water. That film of salt water does cover the entire surface and that means most of the snow melts instantly on the entire street surface even without [passing cyclist's] tyres to disperse the salt. The difference between routes that were cleared and gritted and those that were not (yet) was huge."

I know what you're already thinking: here in the UK we don't deal with adverse weather well.  That we struggle to clear our roads and pavements, let alone cycle paths.  That we can't even build all-weather year-round cycle routes. 

Mud, mud, glorious mud! It's not Middle Earth, but all the same you shall not pass... Via As Easy As Riding A Bike.

Indeed, As Easy As Riding A Bike blog recently highlighted a Sussex cycle route which could provide a safe and convenient bypass to the busy A2 is impassable to all but those equipped with mountain bikes and wellington boots for much of the year.  It's never been laid properly due to concerns about an "urbanising effect" on the countryside, which clearly doesn't consider the same effect car journeys have that could easily be replaced by trips on this path, were it a viable route instead.  Making this journey on the path in its current form on a dark night in wet and windy weather would be reserved for all but the hardiest of thrill-seekers.

The heavy snow fall of 2010 caught London unprepared.  My street, seen here, remained uncleared for over a week.

But as the Dutch example demonstrates, winter weather need not be an insurmountable obstacle for successful cycling.  People always tell me that "there's no such thing as bad weather, only bad clothes" but I'd argue that there's more to it than that... 

You can have all the fancy water proof kit in the world, but if you're having to fend off thundering lorries and itinerant taxi drivers in addition to trying to stay upright through wet and windy weather you're not going to be having a very nice time.  And you could have all the cycle infrastructure in the world (and I'm thinking in particularly of the separated lanes we should start to see being rolled out in London over the next few years) but if the authorities don't have a plan for keeping them clear of mud, snow and ice they'll be next to useless.  Keeping your city cycling, even in the worst of weather, shows the special care and consideration people on two wheels need.

Further reading:
Bicycle Dutch: how to make cycling in the snow possible
Copenhagenize: the ultimate bike lane snow clearance post!
As Easy As Riding a Bike: Natural Character
ibikelondon: Cycling through epic amounts of snow, retro Norway style

Share

This is what 100 years of building bicycle tracks gets you... London has a long way to go.


When even sperm samples are being delivered by bicycle - on a specially adapted "sperm bike" no less - you know you've got a successful cycling city on your hands.  The Danes have been building bicycle tracks in their capital, Copenhagen, since 1912 - and now more than 100 years later they can truly call themselves a "bicycle friendly city".  



This video, the first in a series on bicycle friendly cities produced by Skoda, looks at what it is like to ride a bicycle in Copenhagen:



In the video Mikael Colville-Andersen of Copenhagenize fame explains that bicycles are like vacuum cleaners in Denmark.  Everybody has one, nobody thinks that is unusual, and certainly nobody gets dressed up in funny clothes to do the Hoovering...





Before I visited the city for myself I thought that perhaps the people who chronicle the riders in Copenhagen were choosing their pictures subjectively, and casting the riders in a light they wanted to portray.  But I was wrong; the reality is just like the pictures.  





There are bikes of every shape and size, riders of every shape and size and people who are both very young and very old get around on two wheels.  Why?  It is the most simple and efficient way to get around, and it is subjectively safe enough for a majority of people to ride.


The really wide lane these people are cycling in is a bicycle lane.  There's another - equally wide - lane going in the opposite direction on the other side of the bridge.  In the rush hour it suffers from bicycle "traffic jams".

This concept of subjective safety - how it actually feels to ride a bike - is the basic foundation of creating a successful cycling city that Mikael talks about as being something that you can "cut and paste" in to cities all around the world.  And he's right.  The infrastructure might be slightly different from one country to the next, or certain cities might have their own little innovative quirks, but whether Berlin or Budapest, Lisbon or London, the activity of riding a bicycle for everyday transport has to feel sufficiently safe and inviting for enough people to actually do it in order for mass cycling to occur. 

I love riding in London, but watching this video and reflecting on these images, sometimes I feel we have a long way to go...

PS I thought it was odd that Skoda would choose to make a video about bicycle friendly cities, but they are at pains to point out on their Youtube channel that they were making bicycles long before the automobile came along and they still do today.

Share 

Counting bikes on London's cycle-only street


Hackney Council launched this bike counter on their bicycle-only street, Goldsmiths Row, at midnight on Monday, August the 5th.  Just 15 days later and it has already seen over 69,000 people on bikes have ridden past.

IMG_2742

It works by detecting metal-rimmed wheels rolling over a wire loop in the carriageway which then sends a signal to the counter.  Every time a bike goes past, the tally goes up.  There's two numbers on the counter; one for cyclists who rolled past that day, and one for the total for that year (which presumably will be reset on December 31st so that in the future we don't have to remember that the counters were installed on August 5th!)

IMG_2740

Whilst these cheap and cheerful counters might not do much to improve cyclist's physical comfort and safety, I believe they can certainly help to increase their subjective safety.  At times, riding in London can feel like it is 'you against the world', so it is good to be reminded sometimes that not only are you not alone, but that in fact there are thousands of others also riding bikes around you.  The cycle counts would be through the roof on busier central London cycle routes, something for Transport for London to consider perhaps?  It also sends a bold message to keep a look out as there's (lots) of bikes about.

IMG_9948

On warm and dry Wednesday evening (yesterday) I was cyclist number 4,645 to have ridden past that day at 8.15PM.  When I returned about half an hour later bikes were still passing by every few moments and the counter had clocked up 4,967.  That's 322 bikes in half an hour, or 10 every minute.

Checking this counter will become a bit of a compulsive thing every time I ride past, and I think it is great that Hackney are sending out a message that says "Bikes are great, and welcome here".  Perhaps they could give a new bike away to rider number 500,000, like they did in Copenhagen, to really celebrate?

IMG_9962


We've written about Goldsmiths Row on ibikelondon before - it's quite the favourite haunt of ours.  A simple series of bollards has created London's best bicycles-only street, and is the perfect example of what an effective "quietway" (as proposed by the Mayor in his bold new cycling strategy) ought to be.  Hackney's main roads leave a lot to be desired and are just as unpleasant to ride as everywhere else in London, but the Borough does this sort of quieter back road treatment very well, and we approve.

What number rider will you be today?



IMG_2750

**UPDATE AT 11.30AM 22/08/2013**

There is a fantastic Council-built and well-used BMX track next to Goldsmiths Row which only helps to add to the feeling that this really is a corner of cycling paradise.  We stopped and watched for a while last night, as there were some really incredible riders using the track and performing tricks, as well as some very small brave souls (and one lad who it would appear came dressed as Evil Knievil)  It turns out that BMX legend Bob Haro was in town and stopping by to check in with the local BMX talent, and our friends at Cycle Love were there and captured these awesome photos.  It's a small world after all!


Share |

Why can't we Copenhagenize London? ibikelondon goes to Denmark...

I realised a long-held ambition over the Easter holidays by returning to Copenhagen, this time with camera in hand and a keen eye on the cycle culture over there and the mechanisms in place to support it.

IMG_8466

When I first visited, 5 years ago, I just took it at face value that the Danes were a cycling nation and that's why there were 1000s of cyclists on the streets.  Little did I think that a true cycling culture is made with streets which invite cycling and nurture and treat those who choose to ride.

IMG_8287

When you arrive at Central Station you know instantly that you're in a city where cyclists are welcome.  Up in the station ceiling is a large repeater of the weather vane on the roof so that those just arriving know which way the wind is blowing.  Denmark may not have any mountains to speak of, but nestled as it is on the wrong side of the North Sea it has the meanest head winds, though judging by the racks and racks of bicycle parking right outside the station, the weather is no great disincentive to ride, given the right conditions on the roads.

IMG_8583

The trains, of course, have generous space set aside for bicycles and even in the city centre stations there are lifts or stair gutters to help you get your bike to and from the platform.  And the integration with public transport doesn't stop there.  Out in the sticks the suburban bus stops have bicycle parking to encourage commuters to 'park and ride', and should anyone get a puncture (it happens, even in CPH!) you need only flag a city taxi and the driver will clip on the double bike rack which is carried as standard and make sure you get home in one piece.

IMG_8293

IMG_8338

It's clear that when it comes to making bikes fit with city life, the Danes are doing it right.  When works threaten the route of a bike lane - and half of the city if currently being dug up for a new sewer and Metro system - they don't just erect "Cyclists Dismount" signs, but put in temporary bike lanes around the obstruction.  Temporary road signs, or cables and wires aren't put across the bike lanes, but hoisted well clear above them - why would the city want to slow down its cyclists just to spoil a different mode of transport?

IMG_8306

There's free air on hand in the Town Hall Square for those who might be feeling a little flat, and a blinking bicycle counter tracks how many cyclists have rolled by that year (in red) and even that day (in blue - 10,301 when I took the below photograph on a weekday afternoon) to remind cyclists they're never alone and don't have to feel like a minority, and to gently remind drivers to watch out, as there's lots of bikes about.

IMG_8114 


When the city built their own equivalent of the Millennium Bridge for pedestrians across the sparkling harbour, they didn't forget cyclists but tacked a bike lane on the side.  Meanwhile, cars have to drive a mile the other way before they can cross; what clearer way of saying "people on foot and people on bikes come first"?

IMG_8204

IMG_8208

And everything you've ever read on Copenhagen Cycle Chic about those CPH cyclists is true - the guys and girls of Denmark really do dress for the destination and not the journey.  (And I even got to grace the pages of that great bicycling blog whilst I was there, how cool is that?! See here.)

IMG_8344

Of course, it seems that Copenhageners are well dressed anyway so they do look especially chic when out on their bikes, but everyday and ordinary cycling was the order of the day, using bicycles as tools to get from A to B.  We saw a handful of sports cyclists, flashing by in their lycra colours - they were happy to tear up the bike lanes too and with a simple ping of their bells any slower cyclists moved over to allow them to pass.  Here then, was a bicycle network which supported all kinds of cyclists, not just one....

Mums on bikes...

IMG_8418

...Dads on bikes...

IMG_8407

 ...teenagers on bikes...

IMG_8279

...Grans on bikes...

IMG_7918

...Cops on bikes...

IMG_7905

...who are probably keeping an eye out for people on phones on bikes(!)...

IMG_8038

...indeed, a whole cross-section of society gets around on two wheels. 

IMG_8357
IMG_8359
IMG_8361
IMG_8360

So what is it that has made all of these people choose a bicycle over any other form of transport?  Is it because the Danes are a great cycling nation?  Hardly, Copenhagen was as car clogged as any other Western city in the middle of the last century.  Is it because the city is flat and easy to navigate?  Not really; the centre is a dense core of mediaeval streets and the headwinds are a killer.  The city is no more flat than London and sprawls into suburbia just as much.  Were Copenhageners won over with cycle training, or cycle parking standards, or free maps of the city?  Perhaps, all these things help of course, but that's just nibbling away at the edges rather than dealing with the biggest issue head on.  It was clear to me, throughout the city, that the important difference between Copenhagen and London is that on the big, busy, main roads (think the South Circular, or High Holborn, or Park Lane, or Vauxhall Bridge), cyclists were kept separate from intimidating traffic and given their own slightly raised and generous bike tracks.  At junctions bicycle traffic lights gave them a few seconds head start, and due to their sheer volume turning cars always waited for bicycles to pass before crossing their lanes.  Pedestrians knew not to stray in to the bike tracks, and likewise the cyclists kept out of the way of traffic.  Of course, segregation isn't everywhere; just as here in London it wasn't necessary to keep slow moving traffic on quiet small streets apart, but where it really mattered and counted towards providing a subjective and statistically safe bicycle network for everyone from kids to pensioners on bikes, the infrastructure was there for them all.

IMG_8375

Did I feel ghettoised at all by using this network?  Did it feel like I was relegated to a second-class road user?  Not at all - indeed, cyclists seem to be spoilt by this inviting cycling system.  What's more, I didn't break into one of those "dealing with traffic" adrenaline sweats once during my entire stay.  As my newly-converted-to-cycling partner exclaimed; "I feel safer, happier and more comfortable riding a bike here, on the wrong side of the road, in a foreign country, on a different road network, than I do in my home town.  How wrong is that?"

IMG_8241

IMG_8401

Remind me again, dear readers, why we haven't chosen to follow the same (cycle) path here in London?  Forgive me for sounding cynical, but I'm yet to hear a truly convincing argument as to why we really can't Copenhagenize London...

Share |

Bike Pride! (or what the gay rights movement could teach cycling)

There’s been lots of discussion online recently about the best approach towards growing cycling for the future. Opinions have varied hugely; some believe we have to do all we can to protect existing cyclists’ rights and to look after those who currently choose to get out there by bike. Others have stressed the importance of the potential market for cycling and how we must bring about conditions which will make cycling possible for everyone, instead of hoping that anyone taking to two wheels will simply endure the current status quo. Some are focussed on commuter cyclists whilst others want more everyday widespread ridership. Some are worried about potholes, some about child safety, some fear that their local velodrome is falling apart while others still are looking for the right conditions for a long distance cycle tour.

In recent online debates about the establishment of the Cycling Embassy of Great Britain, there’s been somewhat of a “my way or the highway” undertone from both sides. Carlton Reid, on his bike blog Quickrelease.tv believes that cycling is at risk of splintering, of its message becoming diluted, garbled or even watered down by the creation of another voice for cycling. He believes that in order to succeed, ‘cyclists’ must all pull together in the same direction.

This is where I believe cycling campaigners are missing a trick here in the UK. As my opening paragraph shows, cyclists are a diverse bunch with disparate interests, and rightly so. Some people I know who cycle do so because they believe they are helping to transition to an oil-free society. Others who I know couldn’t give two hoots about traffic reduction if it would impede on their ability to drive, and likewise there are plenty of cyclists I know who care less about their right to ride on all roads and more about creating conditions which they believe would allow their children to cycle safely from one side of town to the other. To expect all of us to work together to the same detailed aims and in the same direction is futile; no one campaign group or aim is going to please everyone on two wheels and risks alienation and inertia by attempting to do so.

If you will indulge me, I’d like to take you on a little social history lesson. Bear with me, as I am certain that similarities and lessons to be learnt will soon become apparent.

Being gay in 1960s Britain was not a particularly comfortable or attractive experience; it was not till 1967 that being gay was even decriminalised. General social attitudes were hostile, gay people were perceived as an odd minority, and if you had any kind of need of recourse to the law you were not guaranteed an even-handed experience, or even for the law to see your side of the story at all. There were, of course, just as many gay and lesbian men and women in the ‘60s as there are today, but many stayed ‘in the closet’ choosing to marry and act out straight lives because the alternative was so wholly unappealing, not to mention terrifying. Amongst gay people themselves there were those who advocated for a quieter, inconspicuous existence for fear that pushing too hard or rocking the boat might lead to harsher enforcement of anti-gay laws and a reduction in any hard won tolerances, no matter how minor those tolerances might be.

Starting to sound familiar at all?

Things came to a head in New York, where America’s gays and lesbians lead an equally unpleasant existence, in June 1969. Any gay bars or nightclubs were strictly illegal and very underground. One such bar was the Stonewall Inn. After a series of Police raids, public ‘outings’ and a general atmosphere of oppression, the gays fought back. An ill-conceived and poorly managed raid on the bar on the night of June 28th rapidly turned into a riot. Gay men and women, drag queens and transvestites took to the streets claiming ‘enough is enough’. People poured out of adjoining bars and the riot turned in to an all-out pitched battle between gay people and the Police; as news spread around the bars and street network of New York more and more people came out to join the protestors, and riots raged for several nights. For the first time in Western history gay people stood up for their rights, and literally fought for them.

The Stonewall Riots in New York lasted several nights.

Now, I’m not advocating that cyclists start a riot anytime soon - I’m not convinced that it would help our cause - but the Stonewall Riot was a ‘touch stone’ event, and what happened next is what is really interesting.

Even before the advent of the internet age, good ideas spread fast. Within six months two gay right advocacy groups had formed in the United States of America and the first ever ‘Gay Pride’ marches took place exactly one year later in Los Angeles, Chicago and New York. A gay rally was held in London in June 1970, and the first Pride March in 1972. Sydney’s Mardi Gras followed in 1978. Fast-forward to today; in 2010 an estimated one million people took to the streets of London to celebrate Pride, and Mardi Gras is worth an estimated 30 million dollars to the Australian economy. In the UK nearly all legislative hurdles to LGBT equality have now been overcome. It is arguable that this would not have been possible without the Pride movement.

The first gay pride march in London

Just as in cycling, there is a broad diversity of gay people with widely differing needs. Some gay people were concerned that they were serving in the military illegally, and lobbied to change the law on that front. Others had concerns about immigration rules which discriminated against multi-national gay couples, whilst others still had worries about hospital visiting rights, wills and probate, adoption and family rights or civil partnerships. The list of hurdles that have been overcome is substantial; with successes such as adoption or immigration rights the success has only affected a small minority of gay people. If each of these ‘minorities within a minority’ had lobbied the Government alone they’d have struggled much longer in order to achieve their goals. However, by participating in Pride they could approach the law makers by demonstrating they were part of a much larger and more powerful voting block. This has been the legacy of Pride; legislative changes which affect a small amount of people but which are important none the less have been secured with the back-up of a million people in the street. Those who wanted adoption rights marched in support of those who wanted to serve openly in the military and vice versa. Solidarity won the day.

As I’ve mentioned, cycling is already represented by a number of different campaigning groups with different aims. Some people want to build more bike lanes; some people want to increase the budget for cycle training. Some of us want to see money spent on developing sports cycling; others still want to improve the lot of cycling commuters. Since the abolition of Cycling England our campaigns must each negotiate with the Government one by one. Separately they have a few thousand members here, or a few thousand members there. No one campaign group is big or powerful enough to be able to go Parliament with a consensus for cyclists. Meanwhile, our Government is busy dismantling Cycling England, dicking around with the Cycle To Work scheme, giving drivers cash for scrap cars and offering huge subsidies on electric motor. In the Courts the judiciary is still letting dangerous drivers get away with murder and our city planners are certainly not ‘thinking bike’ as they design a massively expanded M25.

Cyclist Demonstration on City Hall Square 1970s - Copenhagen
Cyclists demonstrate for better conditons for bicycle, Copenhagen City Hall square, 1970 via Copenhagenize

Whilst we all want different things for cycling, and our diversity is a strong point, when it comes to having our voices heard it is also our Achilles’ heel. It is too easy for our Government to fend off all the minority voices within cycling by getting them to fight for scraps (like the recently established Sustainable Travel Fund). Despite our diversity, however, there is one thing we all agree on and that is that the Government should ‘Put Cycling First’ in all that it does. It’s great that we have different cycling campaigns for different types of cyclists, but perhaps they could learn something from the Gay Pride movement and once a year have all types of cyclists come together to show strength in numbers and solidarity in their similarities. None of our cycling campaigns ought to claim to be the primary voice of cyclists, and neither should they dismiss those which don’t agree with their own ideals. However, I can’t help but feel that British Cycling, or the CTC or even the Cycling Embassy of Great Britain could get the Government to sit up and take notice an awful lot more if they represented not their few thousand individual members but could say they were speaking as part of the million cyclists who had recently taken to the streets...

Maybe it’s time we had a Bike Pride ride of our own? (But please, no Kylie Minogue...)

How can we encourage cargo bike culture?

There are some sectors of society who still see cycling solely as a sport; a sometimes form of exercise as oppose to an everyday and ordinary activity.  Here in London the streets are full of commuting cyclists every morning and in to the evening, but we need to see an expansion in the scope of people riding bikes if we truly want to become a 'cyclised city', as Boris Johnson would like it.

I'd love to see more parents with their kids using bikes as a means to get around town.  I have friends who really resent the fact that they 'need' a second car in order to successfully manage family life.  I have a colleague who would love to commute to work by bike but doesn't know how to integrate this with dropping his kid off at school in the morning.

Of course in established bicycle cultures like Denmark and Holland cargo bikes are used not just to deliver large goods but act as an integral part of everyday family life.  With a cargo bike you can bike the kids to school, do the weekly shop, even move house, and still ride to work.

Away from these bike-centric countries there are early adopters of cargo bikes like Matt from North America who bikes his gorgeous twins around in his bakfiets (follow his exploits over at his blog Bikes Can Work) or the good customers of London cargo bike specialists Velorution.  But, encouraging people to be early adopters of anything is a real uphill struggle - who wants to be the first Mum to rock up on the school run with their kids on a bike when everyone else is rolling around in 4x4s?

Sydney Lord Mayor Clover Moore launches the City of Sydney / Marickville cargo bike library. Photo courtesy of Sydney Cycle Chic.

As a consequence I think we should be doing all we can to encourage families to get riding on cargo bikes.  The benefits are of course just like the benefits of riding any bike, plus the added bonus of getting to spend more time with the kids whilst going from A to B; something we found that was important to parents here before.  But it's a big step to give up a family car and move over to a bike, and some people are initially put off by the cost of cargo bikes (though of course they are not nearly as expensive as running a car or two).  We should continue to maintain our campaigning focus on reducing road danger, providing good cycling infrastructure and all the rest of it, but the City of Sydney has already provided a great template for London to follow.  Launched a few months ago by Sydney Lord Mayor Clover Moore, the Watershed cargo bike Library provides a stock of bike trailers, heavy load riders and cargo bikes for families to test and get used to before they consider buying one for themselves.  The same idea has also been proposed by Kim Harding over at her blog - good ideas spread quickly!  Projects like this can be great enablers in terms of getting people to make that first 'leap of faith' and of course borrowing a bike and finding you love it is a much less daunting prospect compared to giving up the family car outright and hoping for the best.


Streetfilms explores Copenhagen's cargo bike culture at it's cargo bike race. 

Do you have kids?  Would you consider doing the school run on a cargo bike?  Would you borrow one from a Library?  How about it, Boris Johnson?!

Copenhagen Cargo Bikes from Streetfilms on Vimeo.

"Copenhagen: City of Bicycles" book competition!

We came over all excited here at i b i k e l o n d o n towers this week when a freshly printed book dropped on our doormat all the way from sunny Denmark.  "Copenhagen; City of Bicycles" by Cecilia Vanman charts all things two-wheeled about this famous cycling city and we've got a free copy to give away to one of you, lucky dear readers!


Cecilia's text (in English and Danish throughout) is accompanied by beautiful images of the city and it's cycling inhabitants charting the diversity that mass cycling represents.  From beautiful girls on sit up and begs to the hippy bike builders of Christiana; from Mums with their kids (and dogs!) in cargo bikes to Copenhagen's bicycle couriers and their predecessors from yesteryear, the smartly dressed "Swayers" who used to keep the city moving.  The book also covers in detail how Copenhagen became a cycling city and the interventions made to make life easier for those who choose two wheels.  The work of Jan Gehl features strongly of course, and there's a dapper photo and some choice words from the face that launched a 1000 bike blogs Mikael Colville-Andersen of Copenhagenize and Copenhagen Cycle Chic.  There are chapters too, dedicated to the bicycle brands, builders and workshops of Denmark, customized bikes and bikes from which business is conducted such as Copenhagen's beach-side Ice Cream bikes and more on the streets of CPH at night alight with the gentle flicker of dynamo-driven bike lights.  Everything you'd expect to find in a thriving bicycle culture and more.


More than anything this book celebrates the joy that a cyclised city presents and shows the day to day moments of happiness the simple act of riding a bike to school, to the office, down to the shops or just around town can bring.  More important still it tells the story of the battle for Copenhagen's cycle lanes and the history of what was done at street level to ensure cycling was a viable form of transport for all - something our own urban planners and cycle campaigns would do well to take note of!  As author Cecilia says "We Danes often take the bicycle and the ease with which we can use it for granted.  But whenever we stop to think about it, we have only praise for the bicycle.  To be able to get in the saddle and ride along with wind in our hair gives us an extraordinary sense of freedom, one we would find it most difficult to be without."

All in all I'd thoroughly recommend this book to anyone who is interested in different bicycle styles and makes, or in how to make a city bike-friendly.  Fans of photography will find plenty to appease the eye and there is enough here to keep all arm-chair travellers happy.  Who knows, maybe it will inspire you to visit this wonderful Danish city in person?  A great coffee table book and of course Christmas is coming up, maybe you know someone who'd like a copy for themselves?

You can visit the Copenhagen City of Bicycle website to find out more about the book here, the publisher is Nyt Nordisk Forlag and it's available to order online from Arnold's Books for £35 here.

To win a copy for yourself courtesy of i b i k e l o n d o n just enter your details below to be entered in to our prize draw.  As always we will keep your personal details secure and will not share them with anyone else.  You have till midnight on Tuesday to enter - good luck!


Please enter your details below:



Name *



Email *




Powered byEMF Best Form Builder
Report Abuse

 


Share |

Why we need more bikes with baby on board

I cycled the River Lea on Saturday, up from the Thames along the river bank to Hertford.  It's a pretty, if not somewhat bumpy, off-road ride through surprisingly rural pastures.  The sun was shining and the riverside path - part of which forms part of Route 1 of the National Cycle Network - was packed with Mums and Dads out with their kids having a cycling day in the sunshine.  What struck me was how many of these families had arrived by car, the car parks in the Lea Valley Regional Park were crammed with large family cars with cycle racks on the back.  What was stopping them from riding to the river, as oppose to driving there?  Why had an all off-road cycle route, as oppose to the actual road, become a cycling destination in itself?  Could it be that these parents thought that the roads were no place for their children, and that those who cycled on roads did it in spite of the prevailing road conditions, as oppose to because of them?

DSC00009

Last week I attended a public lecture at the LSE by former Lord Mayor of Copenhagen Ritt Bjerregaard.  She was speaking on how sustainabability and cities must go hand and hand into the future, and as former Mayor of one of the great cycling cities of the world I was keen to hear what advice she had for London to increase it's cycling levels.  She gave the usual cycle advocacy advice; provide cycle parking, build good quality cycle lanes etc etc...  However one of her points was really striking and a revelation to me: in order for a cycling city to grow, it must - she said - encourage what she called 'Cargo Bike Culture'.  She explained that in Copenhagen they found that once people settled down and had a family they would put the bicycle away and buy a car to transport their families around; an ultimately unsustainable behavioural pattern.  It was imperative, she explained, that families be allowed to embrace cycling and be given the infrastructure necessary to be able to safely transport their families around.  Ultimately, through engineering and good design, the roads and bike lanes can become somewhere that families feel safe enough to transport their children.  The kids, in turn, feel right at home on a bike and grow up to be the next generation of cycling citizens, as oppose to car-dependant-kids.  The family 4x4 stays at home ("Save it for the drive to your weekend house" said Ritt!) and cycle levels grow.  Less vehicular traffic means safer conditions for cyclists which therefore means more cyclists and so forth and so on...


In Copenhagen they even provide special parking spaces for these families and their cargo bikes.  The 'Cargo Bike Car' takes up one car parking space and splits to provide four secure cycle lockers for the bikes. (via Copenhagenize.com)

I've seen a number of families on two wheels around London over the past year.  There is a lady who I pass most days on the way to work who rides a Christiana cargo bike with her two children onboard, and I've also seen more child seats on the back of bikes appearing.  I applaud these individuals, and my heart lifts every time I see them.  Heck, there's even a little bit of Cargo Bike Culture going on in Chipping Sodbury, the rural Gloucestershire town I grew up in, according to the most excellent cycle blog Biking Brits

Yate Cycle Chic!
Photo courtesy of Biking Brits.

The most-excellent bike shop Velorution does a great job of making buying family-friendly bikes an easy task for all.  But those who do are a distinct minority.  Indeed, even the cycle infrastructure we have isn't geared up to them (can you image trying to get a Christiana or a Bullitt through those annoying motorbike barriers they have on Canals and segregrated cycle routes?)  And if I search in my heart I have to admit I'm not sure how confident I would feel taking small children onto the roads in their current condition, and I am sure most cyclists would think the same.  This, in itself, should tell us all we need to know about where we are going wrong with our present cycle advocacy policies.

DSC09223

I've asked before 'What's stopping women from cycling?', and that post prompted some great comment and debate, but perhaps more directly we should be asking ourselves honestly what is stopping families, and their children, from cycling and more importantly what is being done about it?

Snapped! Copenhagen Cycle Chic

And so we continue with our occasional series of the best in cycling photography blogs around the world...

We all know it's the MacDaddy of street style and cycle chic blogs, but more often than not Mikael Colville-Andersen's photos of life astride a bicycle in Denmark often tell us so much more; just LOOK at these people battling through the coldest winter in years on their bikes.  When you see that, that's when you know you've got true mass cycling.


Check out the original and best 'cycle chic' site here: Copenhagen Cycle Chic

In the interim, have a very happy Easter; ibikelondon is taking a little break over the long weekend, but we'll be back with more cycling news and views on Tuesday 6th April.

Cycling's PR problem, and its serious consequences

Cycling in the UK has a serious problem, and it’s one that’s not going to go away unless it is addressed head-on. Until then there can be no mass cycling in this country, no Mums and Grans on bicycles, no utopian dream of Amsterdam-like streets with the majority gliding down it on two wheels, not four. The problem?

Image.

The majority of people in the UK just can’t imagine themselves using a bicycle on an everyday basis. The humble bicycle has become so ‘alien’ and ‘other’ that it is now the reserve purely of special interest and leisure groups. Using a bike to "go for a ride" on a Sunday afternoon with the kids is seen as just fine here (indeed a significant majority of the UK population own bicycles and do use them for this purpose), but as a practical means of transport for everyday and ordinary use? For most this is almost unimaginable. Once upon a time there were over a BILLION cycle journeys in the UK every year – now the number has fallen so low that the cyclists we see on our roads are a tiny minority. As a modal share of all journeys, bicycles have dropped to just 1% of all traffic.

Minorities are often the victims of prejudice, and prejudice is often without grounds. But the power of prejudice is a strong thing when at work and should not be underestimated. Outside of the UK’s major urban centres, people who choose to cycle instead of drive a car are seen as quirky, or poor – labels that not many people want to associate themselves with.  Racing or long-distance cyclists – the very people who have kept the cycling flame alight in this country during the bike’s lowest ebb – are seen as diet-obsessed, lycra-clad racing machines; so utterly ‘other’ that more ordinary mortals just can’t see themselves doing the same thing. And who wants to use a mode of transport where you have to dress up in funny body-hugging clothes when you can climb into your car in comfort? And sub-cultural groups of cyclists don’t always do themselves any favours either. Have you ever heard racing cyclists talking about their bikes together? It’s all top tubes and bottom brackets and campagnola and derailleurs – great fun if you’re into that kind of thing but total gobbledegook to your Average Joe. Sadly, as these few cyclists are the majority of the minority remaining, the cycle industry markets it’s products to them (as I’ve discussed here before) meaning the public face of cycling is ever more strange which in turn will lead to fewer people taking up their bikes as an everyday means of transport. No one ever watched the Tour de France scratch its way to the top of the Alps in a peloton of glistening lycra and thought "That looks like a normal way of getting to work."

Special interest cycling (racing, mountain biking, BMXing etc) is great, and a source of fun, fitness and pride to many people, but these are ultimately sub-divisions of the same minority. If the cyclists of the UK really want to see mass cycling levels something serious needs to change. The City of Copenhagen is currently aiming to have 50% of all its commuters cycling to work within the next 5 years. London is aiming for just 5%. London’s cyclists – though growing in number every day – are not seen in a positive light by many of London’s other road users. Again, the same prejudice-based principals are holding the majority back from seeing themselves as potentially joining the minority. Outside of cycling communities, London’s riders are seen as a new danger on our roads; pavement riders, red light jumpers, a nuisance or even an outright danger. Worse still we are perceived to be anarchic, untaxed and using roads to which we have no financial entitlement, as a selection of recent comment’s on London’s Evening Standard newspaper testify:

“And what is a cyclist anyway? The old man on his bike, the gang of hoodies on theirs, the Lycra-clad aggressive health freak!!! Cyclists are like cancer cells in the blood stream of life. They pay no dues and suck of others.”
- Kev, London, UK

“Selfish pigs like you [cyclists] clearly show that you have no more respect for more vulnerable pedestrians than litter”
- Jack, Highgate

“...it’s time these self-righteous, sanctimonious law breakers were brought under control...”
- John Bull, London

“They are a menace on the pavements, and I for one refuse to move out the way for them, they are scum nothing more, nothing less.”
- P Staker, London

“Cyclists: dangerous, selfish, arrogant, self absorbed, stupid, ill mannered, nasty heinous creatures.”
- Anticyclist, London

“Shame on you and all the other sweaty, 2-wheeled scum!”
- Sonia Esquilant, Maidenhead, Berkshire, UK.


People follow examples set to them, and we have all been duped into thinking we need the special gear, the funny clothes, the flashy vests, to go about our cycling way – we’ve followed the example of those few cyclists who were left in the first place. And in doing so we are differentiating ourselves from everyday and ordinary people even further and making ourselves into a minority. Even though we all know that cycling has comparable safety rates to being a pedestrian, the hostile road environment doesn’t encourage us to hedge our bets – so we wear our high-vis jackets and fluro vests just in case. A Monday morning commuter stuck behind the wheel of his car in traffic doesn’t see a person peddling by but a strange lycra-clad backside, and quietly seethes inside. Meanwhile, the middle-aged woman at the bus stop seeing us flash past in all our high-viz glory assumes that because cyclists wear all this technical safety gear, cycling itself must be dangerous, and is therefore not something for her. Pedestrians hurrying to work step out from between cars and into the road assuming that their passage is safe because they don’t hear the approach of an engine. A cyclist swerves to avoid them and rushes by at close quarters. The pedestrian – who just isn’t used to looking for people on bikes in the road – curses and accuses us of being maniacs on the road. How many "I was nearly hit by a cyclist!" stories have you heard in comparison to "I stepped into the path of an oncoming cyclist without looking"? There just aren’t enough ordinary people on bikes out there to make it worth the raising of awareness worthwhile.  It becomes the very few us, and the very many them.

If we want mass cycling in this country (and I am making an assumption here that the likes of the CTC and the LCC actually do) it’s up to us to break down the prejudices we face and show ourselves to be everyday and ordinary people. Racing bikes and fancy team strips are just fine if you’re cycling mile after mile, but there’s just no need if you are making a short hop by bike. Remember that 60% of the UK’s car journeys are under 5 miles – there’s no reason why the majority of these trips couldn’t be done in ordinary clothes on an ordinary comfortable bicycle, if only that 60% could actually imagine themselves doing so, and thought that our roads were a safe enough environment to do so. The Dutch and the Danes manage it, why can’t we? As cyclists we all know that the majority of cyclists aren’t really Lance Armstrong wannabes, and nor do we cycle in a reckless or dangerous manner. But it’s the greater public’s perception that counts. The perception of what it means to be ‘a cyclist’, the perception of how safe the roads are, and the perception of the bicycle either as a means of getting from A to B in an ordinary way, or as a quirky, specialist, enthusiast’s machine. No one would dare call us a ‘menace’, ‘heinous’ or ‘scum’ if they thought that they were talking about people like themselves.

1

2

There needs to be a little more ‘cyclist pride’ – showing ourselves to be just like the sort of people who we want to consider taking up cycling, as well as explaining the benefits of our existence to other road users (it’s either us on bikes, or an extra 2420 kilometres of nose to bumper cars on London’s roads). Maybe this would bring about the level of cyclists needed on our roads for the vehicular environment to change in our favour. Until then this country will continue to turn out badly-designed token-effort ‘for minorities’ cycle lanes like this, and prejudice and stereotypes about cyclists in our press and public conscience like this.  Who here thinks they are a member of "the cult of cycling", as opposed to just, you know, getting around town?

Bethnal Green rush hour 6

Out of town; the man behind Copenhagenize and Copenhagen Cycle Chic

Cycling is a broad church indeed and we're as diverse as people in general.  Some of us like to run round muddy tracks racing against each other, some of us like to get togged up in lycra and cleats and ride round and round velodromes (and have the thighs to prove it)  Others still wouldn't even consider themselves as 'cyclists' they're just families who like to get out with the kids and pootle down canal towpaths or through parks and its not about cycling but being out and about together.  Some of us don't care what we ride, so long as we do - not because we like bikes necessarily but because cycling is the sensible option for getting from A to B, whilst saving a packet and keeping fit and living a little at the same time.

I know for certain that my approach to cycling, and the place it can hold in the urban environment, was heavily influenced by the words and photographs of Mikael Colville-Andersen, the man behind the Copenhagenize and Copenhagen Cycle Chic websites.  If you haven't come across these websites yet it's time you checked them out.  It's his writing, right back at the start of my adventures with cycling, that convinced me that as an activity getting on a bike wasn't so 'other' that even I could do it.  Since then it's become an everyday and ordinary activity for me, and now I want it to be the same for other Londoners too. 

Mikael's adventures in the blogosphere started with the upload of a single photo of a lady astride her traditional 'Dutch bike', waiting at the traffic lights, dressed in her ordinary clothes and just going about her business.  The reactions he got were like wildfire and before you could say 'Colville-who?' his websites were born and the rest, as they say, is history.  There is now a proliferation of cycling blogs around the world including 'Amsterdamize', 'Portlandize' and many more.

And now Australian film maker and cycle blogger Mike Rubbo has compiled a short movie which includes an interview with Mikael, and compares the cycling 'scene' in Copenhagen with that of his home (and my old abode) Australia.  I thoroughly enjoyed it, and thought I'd share it all with you in the hope that you do too.  It's great to hear about people who are out there advocating for cycling and spreading the word and hear their thoughts and ideas first-hand.  Oh, and he's got a sweet bike too.